Last Saturday the Times published a headline stating 'Electric cars mean UK could need 20 new nuclear plants'. I organised the submission of a letter to the Times objecting to the headline. The letter has not been printed, although today they did carry a correction (lower left hand corner, page 26) that the headline ‘was a significant miscalculation based on a confusion of energy and power. We apologise for the mistake’.
Yet, the headline and story was repeated by The Mail on the very day the Times retracted it. See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4215622/20-new-nuclear-power-stations-needed-electric-cars.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailUK
Will the Mail also carry an apology? I doubt it.
Of course, as could be expected, far from the Toshiba meltdown causing the UK Government to re-think its nuclear strategy, there are reports that the UK Government is now considering putting billions of pounds of taxpayers money at risk to prop up the failing Moorside nuclear project. Moorside is dependent on the AP1000 reactor design that has failed so miserably and catastrophically to be delivered in the USA (in South Carolina and Georgia). It has ruined Toshiba. Up until now the Hinkley C project (to be developed by EDF) is relying on a 35 year payment of £92.50 in (2012 prices - now about £97/MWh) and on EDF being propped up by large infusions of cash from the French Government.
The electricity consumer will have to pay for Hinkley C, but no more than £2 billion of taxpayers money is being risked as a guaranteed loan. But now people seriously expect the Government to step in as equity providers for Moorside where no company in the world would have the madness to risk their money without a Government guarantee to foot the bill. Indeed the taxpayer plan to fund Moorside is likely to escalate so that tens of billions of pounds of taxpayers money could do down a nuclear black hole, as well as the electricity consumer paying over the odds for 35 years. See https://www.ft.com/content/fc9d036e-ea44-11e6-967b-c88452263daf
It is surely madcap politics to take as a lesson from the fact that a technology is failing for the Government to re-double its efforts to back it - pouring tens of billions of money that could be spent on public services (that is already in very short supply) down the drain for power plant that may take several decades to be built.
Meanwhile of course wind and solar pv farms don't need any taxpayer money. They can be built at lower prices than nuclear power - but of course the Government is only now issuing contracts for nuclear power!
Paul Dorfman made some useful comment on the Toshiba meltdown at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXA8NsM1W7c&app=desktop
See our letter below:
We are concerned about the highly tendentious headline ‘Electric cars mean UK could need 20 new nuclear plants’ (report February 11th). The story speculated about the need for increased electricity supply.
The headline implies dogmatically that increases in non-fossil generation can only come from nuclear power rather than green energy. Why not speculate instead about the number of windfarms, solar farms or energy efficiency measures needed?
The changing profile of UK electricity requires a flexible supply system based on variable renewable energy, storage, power plant reserves and responsive demand and charging systems - not outdated, inflexible and, so far, undeliverable nuclear power.
In the last 15 years renewable energy has expanded from around 3 per cent to what will soon be 30 per cent of UK electricity consumption. In the same period not a single nuclear power plant has come on line, nor is likely to at least until 2026, and even then only with luck and huge expense.
Dr David Toke, Reader in Energy Politics, University of Aberdeen, tel 07583568643, email: email@example.com, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen AB24 3QY
Jeremy Leggett, Solar Century, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Jonathon Porritt, Forum for the Future, email: JPOffice@forumforthefuture.org
Professor Andrew Stirling, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, email: email@example.com
Professor (Emeritus) Dave Elliott, Department of Engineering and Innovation, Open University, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tom Burke, Chairman, E3G, email: email@example.com
Professor Mark Pelling, Department of Geography, Kings College London, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Professor Gordon Walker, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, email: email@example.com
Professor Jeffrey Henderson, Professor of International Development, University of Bristol, email: Jeffrey.Henderson@bristol.ac.uk
Professor (Emeritus) Andrew Blowers, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Open University, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Professor (Emeritus) Bryan Wynne, Science Studies, Lancaster University, email: email@example.com
Professor Mark Lemon, Institute for Energy and Sustainable Development, De Montford University, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Alan Terry, Senior Lecturer in Geography, University of West of England, email: Alan.Terry@uwe.ac.uk
Dr Philip Johnstone, Research Fellow, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, email P.Johnstone@sussex.ac.uk
Dr David Lowry, independent consultant email: email@example.com
Dr Abhishek Agarwal, Senior Lecturer in Strategy and Policy, Robert Gordon University, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr. Gabor Sarlos, Senior Lecturer, University of Worcester, email: email@example.com
Emily Cox, Associate Tutor, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, email: E.Cox@sussex.ac.uk
David Thorpe, Sustainability Author and Consultant, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Michel Lee, Senior Analyst, Promoting Health and Sustainable Energy, email email@example.com
Dr Matthew Cotton, Lecturer, Department of Environment, University of York email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Katherine Begg, email: email@example.com
Dr Paul Dorfman, The Energy Institute, University College London, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Ben Fairweather, Faculty of a Technology, De Montford University, email: email@example.com
Dr Ian Fairlie, independent consultant, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dr Matt Watson, Senior Lecturer in Human Geography, University of Sheffield, email: M.Watson@sheffild.ac.uk